🔗 Share this article

The beluga known as Jelly Bean’s daughter Bertie Botts is an adorable little “ham sandwich”. The whale Orion – nicknamed “Onion” – is a big but fiercely protective companion. Zephyr has “constant motion” and sways like a worm. Lillooet is the “most affectionate” with a gentle spirit.

A group of thirty captive marine mammals in a Canada-based amusement park have become pawns in a disagreement between a shuttered park, government authorities and welfare campaigners.

But those closest to the whales say the impassioned controversy over their destiny often ignores the nuances of the whales who, after spending their lives in confinement, have been closely studied by the humans who see them each day.

After the Canadian government blocked the sale of the belugas to a foreign facility, the controversial amusement park near Niagara Falls where they are held warned to end their lives unless the federal government pays for the upkeep of keeping them alive. The nation’s fisheries minister has denied that request, placing the 30 whales in an increasingly precarious circumstance.

Highly Cognitive Marine Mammals

Scientists say that belugas’ brain structure, along with their vocal imitation skills, problem solving and group interactions point to they are deeply intelligent creatures – something a former trainer learned first-hand.

She spent three years as a marine mammal specialist, a role that entailed earning the trust of the aquatic animals.

“Building up those bonds over time takes a lot of dedication and a lot of love. At the outset, they’re very unsure of you,” she said. “In time, you gain shared confidence. And they start being more vulnerable with you. It’s just so extraordinary and rewarding.”

The trainer knew the whales were exceptionally cognitive, but she says she was nevertheless astounded by the nuances and quirks in their personalities. She cultivated a special affection for a pair of whales with contrasting natures.

“Eve chose me. The other made me earn it,” she said. “Both changed the way I perceive relationships.”

Growing Opposition and Facility Decline

Burgess’s relationship with the whales progressed against a backdrop of increasing societal concern to their confinement.

During her tenure at the facility, multiple belugas and the park’s one orca, the orca, passed away. In all, 19 belugas have perished at the park since recent years, a number which the facility ascribes to age-related causes, but which advocates say points to the substandard environment in which they were kept.

The facility did not open to the public over the summer, but Burgess says she saw with her own eyes results of the cessation. “Concrete is falling apart from the enclosures because they’re in disrepair and not being fixed. The whales are curious and so they grab fragments and move about with fragments in their mouth. It’s upsetting to see.”

The park did not respond to a inquiry, but previously asserted: “The whales … obtain far superior medical attention and 24/7 attention than any human in the United Kingdom, or other places.”

Uncertain Future and Proposed Solutions

The former employee was fired from the facility in the spring following the passing of a beluga, an ailing beluga the caretakers had to put down. She said the facility believed details of the incident were shared to the news outlets and she was fired soon after.

The lack of clarity over the whales’ fate has left her and staff members in distress. She says the park’s threat to euthanize its whales is a bargaining chip and is a “practically unfeasible” endeavor, adding any plans to humanely kill even a one beluga would require “significant manpower”, vehicles and machinery.

“It cannot happen in hell the caretakers would ever do it,” she said.

She advocates for demands for the whales to be taken right away from the facility, with its failing enclosures and dwindling staff.

In the autumn, the nation’s government official turned down a request to transfer the whales to an overseas location.

“To approve the request would have meant a continued existence in captivity and a reversion to public entertainment,” the official stated. “As the public, we know that marine mammals should be in the wild, not in pools for our enjoyment. I could not in clear conscience permit an relocation that would prolong the conditions these belugas have endured.”

But the former trainer said the official’s comments reflect a broader incorrect perception of the realities of life for belugas living their whole lives in enclosures.

“The people needs to realize these are whales that have lived entirely in confinement and they will need ongoing assistance for the remainder of their lives,” she said. “People just don’t understand that it’s not as straightforward as saying ‘close it down’.”

Alternative Habitat and Ongoing Debate

As officials struggle to find a solution, ideas have emerged, some of which have questionable practicality. An idea called for the belugas to be freed into the open waters of Canada’s north – where whales are a key source of nourishment for Inuit communities.

A proposed protected area in the province of eastern Canada, which now received official endorsement, has proven most controversial. The planned site, which includes a large area of enclosed sea water, remains undeveloped. Supporters remain hopeful that it could ultimately represent a permanent resolution for eight of the whales.

But, the former trainer says, among staff she’s discussed with, there is “doubts there” about what she said is “only an untested concept” in the whales’ future.

Different voices say the idea of a protected habitat represents a worldwide trend away from captive facilities and could represent a feasible plan in the near future.

An official, head of the initiative, said the facility will replicate the cognitive activities and feeding regimen the whales obtain from trainers, albeit in a much larger environment. He said after the medical condition of whales is completely examined, which could take months|an extended period|